FXSort
Loading official market snapshots…Sources & freshness ↗
Automated source checks · view data status ↗
Crypto trading costs

Crypto Maker and Taker Fees: Estimate the Cost of an Order

Understand liquidity-based fees, partial fills and volume tiers before comparing crypto exchange spot pricing.

THE KEY TAKEAWAY

Identify how each portion of an order fills, calculate entry and exit fees separately, and keep spot, instant-buy and derivatives schedules distinct.

Maker and taker describe how an order fills

A maker order adds liquidity to the order book before it is matched; a taker order executes against available liquidity. The order’s interaction with the book matters more than whether its button is labelled “limit” or “market.” A limit order priced to execute immediately can still take liquidity.

Kraken and Gemini explain their fee structures in official schedules. Their precise rates, tiers and product scope can change, so use the current page for the interface and region you intend to use. The crypto exchange directory links to those sources without assuming a single rate applies to every customer.

Calculate both legs of a trade

Take an invented fee example: an entry worth $2,000 at a 0.20% rate would cost $4. If an exit later has a $2,050 notional and also carries 0.20%, that leg costs $4.10. The total explicit trading fee would be $8.10. Different entry and exit notionals produce different cash charges.

If the hypothetical entry instead earns a lower maker rate, recalculate that leg rather than applying the lower rate to the whole trade. A single order can also have portions that execute differently. Read the exchange’s treatment of partial fills and inspect the transaction history to understand which rates were actually applied.

Keep product, tier and payment method separate

A spot order-book schedule can differ from an instant-buy quote, a conversion service or a derivatives market. A fee discount may depend on qualifying activity, a balance, a subscription or another condition. Compare the standard applicable tier first and show any optional discount with its own requirements.

Do not confuse trading fees with a card purchase charge, deposit cost or withdrawal fee. For an illustrative round trip, enter your assumed per-side rate in the fee estimator, then remember that its simple output excludes those separate items. Check when the exchange recalculates the tier and which volume is counted.

Include price impact in the final comparison

Explicit fees do not capture the entire execution cost. The bid–ask spread, available liquidity and the size of your order can influence the prices obtained. A lower published fee does not establish a lower all-in cost for every pair or order.

Record the pair, order size, interface, fee tier and date when comparing observations. Use an order preview and official schedule rather than assuming a promotional banner covers every market. Our spot versus perpetuals guide explains another important scope difference. The objective is a clear cost estimate for a defined order, not a promise that a particular exchange will deliver the best execution.

Sources & further reading

Educational research. Examples are hypothetical. Provider terms and regional availability can change. Suggest a correction.

Put the comparison into practice

Open the directory, choose a category and select up to three providers to compare.

Compare providers →
KEEP READING

More from the journal.

All articles ↗

Static vs Trailing Drawdown: Follow the Loss Floor

Use simple examples to understand a fixed loss floor, a moving high-water mark and the questions that change a prop program comparison.

Read the guide

Daily Loss Limits and Reset Times: What Carries Overnight?

Learn why a new trading day can change your risk buffer even when you leave the same positions open.

Read the guide

Profit Split vs Payout Rules: Why the Headline Is Not Enough

Separate starting reward share, scaling maximums and withdrawal eligibility when comparing prop firm programs.

Read the guide
THE DETAILS, SIDE BY SIDE

Your comparison